Why Do Men Take Risks?

Men taking risks is often criticised. They are sometimes seen as irresponsible, but this behaviour has both cultural and evolutionary origins.

From an evolutionary perspective, a woman’s strategy is to choose the best available man for the role of provider and protector. A man who doesn’t take risks cannot adequately protect his partner and offspring. Men are aware of the dangers, but they are also aware of the potential rewards.

Consider a scenario that might have happened not too long ago in the wild: A couple with a baby encounters a predator, like a lion. Both could try to fight the lion, risking their lives and the baby’s. Alternatively, they could both flee, but since most predators are faster than humans, this strategy might also lead to their demise. Another possibility is for the woman to tackle the predator while the man escapes with the baby, but this goes against evolutionary constraints where men are typically larger, stronger, and thus better suited for such confrontations.

The most logical scenario is for the man to tackle the predator while the woman escapes with the baby. Even if the man dies, the survival of the woman and child is ensured. This isn’t ideal, but it’s better than losing both the woman and the child. In this sense, the man is somewhat disposable; if he dies, the woman might mourn him, but she will continue to care for their child.

To be prepared for such dangers and to prove himself as a protector and provider, a man must demonstrate his ability to take risks. He must be willing to risk his life, fully aware he might lose, yet striving to prevail.

Hence, a man who does not take risks is not seen as an eligible mate. Men take risks because not doing so would fail to impress women, and failing to impress could mean not procreating. This aspect of male behaviour hasn’t changed over the years; men must be risk-takers to succeed, as women prefer winners.